Homeland Security Act

An Analysis of the of 2002As a response to the September 11 , 2001 terrorist attacks , the articulation States g everyplacenment established a separate agency indoors the federal official system to prevent future terrorist activities . Hence , the discussion motion of Homeland Security (DHS ) was created , along with the of 2002 (HSA . The HSA identified and explained the principle legal power and duties of the Department of Homeland Security . The HSA likewise reinforced sentences for transgressing estimate security virtues and expanded federal give of local justness of nature enforcement agenciesHowever , critics argued that the HSA instead promoted Ameri great deal global dominance at the spending of civil liberties . For instance , Title II pushed for the physical composition of a Directorate of Information Ana lysis and al-Qaida tribute , tasked with the macrocosm and maintenance of a database containing public and private development on virtually any individual in the fall in States . bring forward records , banking transactions , school records , employment tale - these can be ga at that placed to constituent together a pro that can be use against innocent people suspected as terroristsIn the HAS Title V : Emergency Prep ardness and Response , there is no circumstantial mandate of federal control over the local foremost responders - the police , the firemen and the emergency military force . The prep evidently called for federal supervision , funding and cooperation (Van Bergen , 2002 ) Although centralization is utter(a) for emergency cookery on a sufficiently rotund scale , it could also lead to the loss of local control and to potential federal militarization (Van Bergen , 2002 ) According to the United States northerly Command (USNC Prohibiting use up military i nvolvement in law enforcement is in retenti! on with long-standing U .S . law and policy change the military s persona in domestic affairs (Van Bergen , 2002 ) In addition , the posse Comitatus Act ( HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ? entitle 18 sec 1385 18 USC 1385 ) generally prohibits U .S .

military personnel from interdicting vehicles , vessels and aircraft conducting watchfulness searches , pursuit and seizures or making arrests on behalf of noncombatant law enforcement authorities (Van Bergen , 2002 ) The four statutory exceptions to this prohibition are the followers : counter-drug assistance (10 USC HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 10 sec 371 371 - HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 10 sec 381 81 sedition Act (10 USC HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 10 sec 331 331 - HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 10 sec 334 34 crimes apply thermonuclear materials ( HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 18 sec 831 18 USC 831 and chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /ts_search .pl ?title 10 sec 382 10 USC 382 (Van Bergen , 2002One of the most serious consequences of the HAS is the exact Infrastructure Information Act of 2002 (CIIA . The CIIA offered corporations confidentiality and immunity from civil financial engagement with respect to the critical infrastructure information (CII ) that they submitted voluntarily to the DHS . CII...If you see to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay